Is this what Governor Sanford means when he says SC shouldn't invest in higher education like NC?

South Carolina's long term under-investment in higher education costs over $11 billion annually in personal income relative to North Carolina. That deficit in compensation suffered by South Carolina citizens is 25 BMWs or 13 Boeings - after Boeing is fully mature.

An editorial written by Governor Mark Sanford in The State demonstrates an amazing lack of understanding of the cost of South Carolina's long term under-investment in higher education relative to North Carolina. In arguing that we invest too much in higher education in South Carolina, Governor Sanford said,

    Misperceptions will need to be dealt with [like], “We need to spend as North Carolina does in higher education.”

    If we try to match North Carolina, we need to recognize we’ll have to raise taxes. I think this would be a mistake, cost jobs and make higher ed that much more difficult to attain for many families.

Here is the true cost of a lack of education in metropolitan counties in South Carolina relative to Wake County, North Carolina (Raleigh).

County BS degree Per Capita Income Gap Population Income Deficit
Wake County NC (Raleigh) 43.9% $39,497 --- 866,410 ---
Charleston SC 30.7% $36,326 $3,171 348,046 $1,103,653,866
Richland SC (Columbia) 32.5% $33,157 $6,340 364,001 $2,307,766,340
Greenville SC 26.2% $33,460 $6,037 438,119 $2,644,924,403

The lack of education cost Greenville $2.6 billion in personal income relative to Raleigh. $2.6 billion!!

It's is even more awesome to look at this from a state level.

State BS degree Per Capita Income Gap Population Income Deficit
North Carolina 22.5% $32,247 --- 9,222,414 ---
South Carolina 20.4% $29,767 $3,171 4,479,800 $11,109,904,000

The lack of education cost South Carolina $11 billion in personal income annually relative to North Carolina. What would we do to attract a company to South Carolina that would generate $11 billion in annual economic impact?

Let's put this in perspective. Smiley and Associates says that Boeing, which Sanford claims is his biggest economic success, will pay $826 million in annual compensation - in 2027!. The deficit in personal income from South Carolina's lack of education relative to North Carolina is 13 Boeings - after it is fully mature!

BMW will pay $435 million in annual compensation. The deficit in personal income from South Carolina's lack of education relative to North Carolina is 25 BMWs.

Governor Sanford ends his argument against enhancing higher education in South Carolina by noting that "Interestingly, as N.C. taxes have continued to rise, our state has pulled in roughly 70 percent more in capital investment per capita than North Carolina." The State of South Carolina has invested in recruiting branch manufacturing. The State of North Carolina has invested in higher education. There is no question that the citizens of North Carolina get the better deal.

See 11256 other posts submitted by John Warner. Find articles, people, and videos related to: Higher Education

Good analysis. What Sanford's comments really indicate is a political climate where the governor takes an easy way out and focuses on pandering to a sound-bite mentality of lower taxes regardless of long term impact. A truly effective governor would have a longer term view and picking his fights for taxes and the overall welfare of the state.
Missing in this current anti-taxation focus is how to pay for government with lower income? The majority of state and federal budgets fund entitlements, "third rail of politics". Unfortunately, education spending isn't in this category and becomes an easy target i.e. cut today but not see the real consequences for years.

Great points, John. And my question is, How well as has the policy of refusing to raise taxes for any reason at any time worked for South Carolina? Why do we continue to rank at the very bottom of every indicator of social well being if this long standing policy is such a great idea?

I know I'd be willing to pay a few more dollars in taxes each year if it meant my kids would get a better education, if SC's workforce was more competitive, if more innovative business located here and provided more jobs, and we were more prosperous as a region. How about you?